This volume brings together contributions from leading specialists in syntax and morphology to explore the complex relation between periphrasis and inflexion from both a synchronic and diachronic perspective The chapters draw on data from across the Romance language family including standard and regional varieties and dialects The relation between periphrasis and inflexion raises questions for both syntax and morphology and understanding the phenomena involved requires cooperation across these sub domains For example the components that express many periphrases can be interrupted by other words in a way that is common in syntax but not in morphology and in some contexts a periphrastic form may be semantically equivalent to a single word inflected form with which it arguably forms part of a paradigmatic set Patterns of this kind are found across Romance albeit with significant local differences Moreover diachrony is essential in understanding these phenomena and the rich historical documentation available for Romance allows an in depth exploration of the changes and variation involved as different members of the family may instantiate different stages of development Studying these changes also raises important questions about the relation between attested and reconstructed patterns Although the empirical focus of the volume is on the Romance languages the analyses and conclusions presented shed light on the development and nature of similar structures in other language families and provide valuable insights relevant to linguistic theory more broadly
